How is The Impact of Applying Contextual Approach in Mathematics Learning?

Authors

  • Linda Indiyarti Putri Universitas Wahid Hasyim
  • Siti Irene A. Dwiningrum Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Heri Retnawati Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Guldana A. Begimbetova Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University
  • Sultan Salem University of Birmingham

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54069/attadrib.v8i1.888

Keywords:

Meta-analysis, Multi-contextual approach, Mathematics learning, Effect size, Moderator variables

Abstract

This meta-analysis examines the effectiveness of multi-contextual approaches in mathematics learning and explores moderator variables that influence their impact. A total of 27 effect sizes from 14 empirical studies (2015–2023) involving 2,501 students were analyzed using a random effects model via R Studio. Studies were sourced from major academic databases, including ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed. The analysis yielded an overall effect size of 0.65 (p < 0.0001), indicating a substantial impact on students’ mathematical abilities. Moderator analysis revealed that educational level, instructional model combinations, and geographic region significantly influenced effectiveness, while sample size did not. Notably, integrating mathematics with technology and Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) produced the highest effect sizes. These findings support multi-contextual strategies to enhance mathematics learning outcomes and offer valuable insights for educators, curriculum developers, and researchers. The study also highlights the need for future research across diverse educational settings to refine and contextualize effective practices. The study encourages educators to adopt culturally and technologically relevant teaching practices. It also calls for policy support in scaling contextual learning models and investing in teacher training across educational settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, C. M., & Pierce, R. L. (2006). Diferentiating instruction: A practical guide to tiered lessons in the elementary grades. In Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Arik, S., & Yilmaz, M. (2020). The effect of constructivist learning approach and active learning on environmental education: A meta-analysis study. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 10(1), 44–48.

Benavides-Varela, S., Zandonella Callegher, C., Fagiolini, B., Leo, I., Altoè, G., & Lucangeli, D. (2020). Effectiveness of digital-based interventions for children with mathematical learning difficulties: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 157(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103953

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V, Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. A John Wiley and Sons. Ltd., Publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386

Chen, C., Shih, C., & Law, V. (2020). The effects of competition in digital game based learning (DGBL): a meta analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09794-1

Columbano, M. Q. (2019). Reinforcing students’ mathematical skills through cooperative learning strategy. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(12), 3774–3781. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.L2683.1081219

Cooper, H. M. (2017). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis?: A Step-by-Step Approach (Fifth). SAGE Publications.

Coti?, N., Coti?, M., Felda, D., & Vodopivec, J. L. (2015). An example of integrated teaching of mathematics and environmental education in the second grade of basic school. New Educational Review, 41(3), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2015.41.3.01

Crnkovi?, V. M., Traunkar, I., & Crnkovi?, B. (2022). Treasure Hunt as a Method of Learning Mathematics. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Games-based Learning (Vols. 2022-Octob, pp. 349–357). https://doi.org/10.34190/ecgbl.16.1.740

Das, K. (2021). Inclusive Mathematics Education in Classroom Practice. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 8(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v8i3.3462

Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Bossche, P. Van Den. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning?: a meta- analysis. 13, 533–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7

Dulama, M. E., & Magdas, I. (2014). Analysis The Competences And Contents Of " Mathematics And Environmental Exploration " Subject Syllabus For Preparatory “ M Athematics And E Nvironmental E Xploration .” 7(2), 11–24.

Elmedina Nikoçeviq-Kurti. (2022). European Journal of Educational Research. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1245–1257.

Faragher, R., Clarke, B., & Hil, J. C. (2016). Inclusive Practices in Mathematics Education. Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2012-2015, December 2017, 1–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2

Ferguson, C. J., & Heene, M. (2012). A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories: Publication Bias and Psychological Science’s Aversion to the Null. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459059

Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From Gatekeeping to Engagement?: A Multicontextual , Mixed Method Study of Student Academic Engagement in Introductory STEM Courses. 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y

Gervasoni, A., & Peter-Koop, A. (2020). Inclusive mathematics education. In Mathematics Education Research Journal (Vol. 32, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00315-0

Glass, G. V. (2015). Meta-analysis at middle age: A personal history. Research Synthesis Methods, 6(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1133

Greenstein, S., & Baglieri, S. (2018). Imagining mathematical thinking for inclusive curriculum: A conversation. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 10(3), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1467091

Gusteti, M. U., & Neviyarni, N. (2022). Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Di Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Lebesgue?: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika Dan Statistika, 3(3), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v3i3.180

Haji, S., Yumiati, Y., & Zamzaili, Z. (2019). Improving Students’ Productive Disposition through Realistic Mathematics Education with Outdoor Approach. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 4(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v4i2.8385

Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Testing for moderator variables in meta-analysis: Issues and methods. Communication Monographs, 58(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759109376240

Harwell, M. (2020). Growth in the Amount of Literature Reviewed in a Meta-Analysis and Reviewer Resources. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 32(1), 31–47.

Healy, L. (2014). Changing perspectives on inclusive mathematics education: Relationships between research and teacher education. Education as Change, 18. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2013.877847

Hendriyanto, A., Priatna, N., Juandi, D., Dahlan, J. A., Hidayat, R., Sahara, S., & Muhaimin, L. H. (2023). Learning Mathematics Using an Ethnomathematics Approach: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(7), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i7.6012

Illene, S., Feranie, S., & Siahaan, P. (2023). Create multiple-choice tests based on experimental activities to assess students ’ 21st century skills in heat and heat transfer topic. 17(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i1.20540

Indriati, M., Turmudi, T., & Dahlan, J. A. (2022). Effectiveness of ethnomathematics-based visual thinking approach in increasing mathematics literacy and cultural motivation. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 5(4), 394–402. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i4.145

Irma Risdiyanti, Prahmana, R. C. I., & Shahrill, M. (2019). The learning trajectory of social arithmetic using an indonesian traditional game. Elementary Education Online, 18(4), 2094–2108. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639439

Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., & Tamur, M. (2022a). A Meta-Analysis of the last two decades of realistic mathematics education approaches. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15122a

Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., & Tamur, M. (2022b). A Meta-Analysis of the last two decades of realistic mathematics education approaches. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15122a

Kania, N., & Juandi, D. (2023). Does self-concept affect mathematics learning achievement?? 17(3), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i3.20554

Lady, A., Utomo, B. T., & Lovi, C. (2018). Improving mathematical ability and student learning outcomes through realistic mathematic education (RME) approach. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(2), 55–57. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.10.10954

Liburd, K. K. D., & Jen, H. Y. (2021). Investigating the effectiveness of using a technological approach on students’ achievement in mathematics–case study of a high school in a Caribbean country. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105586

Lisenbee, P. S., & Tan, P. (2010). Mentoring Teachers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WHOLE SCHOOLING, 15(1), 611–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71799-9_250

Luitel, B. C. (2018). A mindful inquiry towards transformative curriculum vision for inclusive mathematics education. Learning: Research and Practice, 4(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2018.1428141

Makonye, J. P. (2014). Teaching Functions Using a Realistic Mathematics Education Approach: A Theoretical Perspective. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 07(03). https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322.2014/07.03.27

Moreira, G. E., & Manrique, A. L. (2014). Challenges in Inclusive Mathematics Education: Representations by Professionals Who Teach Mathematics to Students with Disabilities. Creative Education, 05(07), 470–483. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.57056

Muhtarom, Nizaruddin, Nursyahidah, F., & Happy, N. (2019). the Effectiveness of Realistic Mathematics Education To Improve Students’ Multi-Representation Ability. Infinity Journal, 8(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i1.p21-30

Mullen, B., Muellerleile, P., & Bryant, B. (2001). Cumulative meta-analysis: A consideration of indicators of sufficiency and stability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1450–1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711006

Muslimin, Indra Putri, R. I., Zulkardi, & Aisyah, N. (2020). Learning integers with realistic mathematics education approach based on islamic values. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.11.3.11721.363-384

Ndiung, S., Sariyasa, Jehadus, E., & Apsari, R. A. (2021). The effect of treffinger creative learning model with the use rme principles on creative thinking skill and mathematics learning outcome. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 873–888. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14249a

Nguyen, T. T., Trinh, T. P. T., Ngo, H. T. V., Hoang, N. A., Tran, T., Pham, H. H., & Bui, V. N. (2020). Realistic mathematics education in Vietnam: Recent policies and practices. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.81.57.71

Nguyen Thi Nga, Dung, T. M., Ho, L. T. B. T. T., Nguyen, T.-T., Tong, D. H., Van, T. Q., & Uyen, B. P. (2023). The Effectiveness of Teaching Derivatives in Vietnamese High Schools Using APOS Theory and ACE Learning Cycle. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.507

Padilla, A., & Tan, P. (2019). Toward inclusive mathematics education: a metatheoretical reflection about countering ableism in mathematics standards and curriculum. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(3), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1576941

Park, S., & Hong, S. (2016). The empirical review of meta-analysis published in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016- 9433-x

Phan, T. T., Do, T. T., Trinh, T. H., Tran, T., Duong, H. T., Trinh, T. P. T., Do, B. C., & Nguyen, T.-T. (2022). A Bibliometric Review on Realistic Mathematics Education in Scopus Database Between 1972-2019. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 1133–1149.

Pigott, T. D., & Polanin, J. R. (2020). Methodological Guidance Paper: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153

Prahmana, R. C. I., & Istiandaru, A. (2021). Learning sets theory using shadow puppet: A study of javanese ethnomathematics. Mathematics, 9(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9222938

Prahmana, R. C. I., Sagita, L., Hidayat, W., & Utami, N. W. (2020). Two Decades of Realistic Mathematics Education Research in Indonesia: a Survey. Infinity Journal, 9(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p223-246

Priyambodo, P., Paidi, P., Wilujeng, I., & Widowati, A. (2023). Ethno-ECLIPSE learning model?: The bridge between collaboration and critical thinking skills. 17(4), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i4.20876

Rakes, C. R., Ronau, R. N., Bush, S. B., Driskell, S. O., Niess, M. L., & Pugalee, D. K. (2020). Mathematics achievement and orientation?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of education technology. Educational Research Review, 31(May), 100337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100337

Retnawati, H., Apino, E., Kartianom, Djidu, H., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Pengantar Analisis Meta (Edisi 1) (Issue July). Parama Publishing.

Risdiyanti, I., & Indra Prahmana, R. C. (2020). The learning trajectory of number pattern learning using barathayudha war stories and uno stacko. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.10225.157-166

Safarati, N., & Zuhra, F. (2022). Literature Review: Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Di Sekolah Menengah. Genta Mulia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 15–26.

Sass, W., De Maeyer, S., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2023). Honing action competence in sustainable development: what happens in classrooms matters. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(4), 3649–3670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02195-9

Schwabe, I., Boomsma, D. I., & Berg, S. M. Van Den. (2017). Increased environmental sensitivity in high mathematics performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.018

Sidekerskien?, T., & Damaševi?ius, R. (2023). Out-of-the-Box Learning: Digital Escape Rooms as a Metaphor for Breaking Down Barriers in STEM Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097393

Sitthikrai, N., Hemtasin, C., & Thongsuk, T. (2023). Development of academic achievements using inquiry-based learning together with educational games. 17(3), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i3.20859

Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001

Sunzuma, G., Zezekwa, N., Gwizangwe, I., & Zinyeka, G. (2021). A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ethnomathematics and Traditional Lecture Approaches in Teaching Consumer Arithmetic: Learners’ Achievement and Teachers’ Views. Pedagogical Research, 6(4), em0103. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11215

Suparman, Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2021). Review of problem-based learning trends in 2010-2020?: A meta-analysis study of the effect of problem-based learning in enhancing mathematical problem-solving skills of Indonesian students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1772(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012103

Supriadi, N., Khaidir, C., & Anggoro, B. S. (2022). Investigating the effectiveness of using various mathematics learning media among students with various learning styles. 13(1), 189–198.

Syafriafdi, N., Fauzan, A., Arnawa, I. M., Anwar, S., & Widada, W. (2019). The tools of mathematics learning based on realistic mathematics education approach in elementary school to improve math abilities. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(7), 1532–1536. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070707

Tambak, S., Marwiyah, S., Sukenti, D., Husti, I., & Zamsiswaya, Z. (2023). Problem-based learning methods?: Is it effective for developing madrasa teacher social competence in teaching?? 17(3), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i3.20796

Tamur, M., Katolik, U., Santu, I., Juandi, D., & Indonesia, U. P. (2020). Effectiveness of Constructivism Based Learning Models Against Students Mathematical Creative Thinking Abilities in Indonesia?; A Meta-Analysis Study Effectiveness of Constructivism Based Learning Models Against Students Mathematical Creative Thinking Abil. August. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296507

Tan, P. (2017). Advancing Inclusive Mathematics Education: Strategies and Resources for Effective IEP Practices. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 13(3), 28–38.

Trujillo, K., Chamberlin, B., Wiburg, K., & Armstrong, A. (2016). Measurement in Learning Games Evolution: Review of Methodologies Used in Determining Effectiveness of Math Snacks Games and Animations. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-016-9282-z

Turgut, S., & Turgut, I. G. (2018). The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Mathematics Achievement in Turkey: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11345a

Vodi?ková, B., Mitašíková, P., & Slaví?ková, M. (2023). Supportive Factors in Inclusive Mathematics Education: Mathematics Teachers’ Perspective. Education Sciences, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050465

Wang, Z., Oh, W., Malanchini, M., & Borriello, G. A. (2020). The developmental trajectories of mathematics anxiety?: Cognitive , personality , and environmental correlates. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(May), 101876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101876

Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0100-9

Yunita;, Y., Juandi;, D., Suparman, & Hasanah;, A. (2022). Meta-analysis study: How effective is a project-based learning model on students’ mathematical problem-solving abilities? 2468, 070024. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0102458

Zakiah, N. E., Sunaryo, Y., & Amam, A. (2019). Implementasi Pendekatan Kontekstual Pada Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berdasarkan Langkah-Langkah Polya. Teorema: Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 4(2), 111–120.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

Putri, L. I., Dwiningrum, S. I. A. ., Retnawati, H. ., Begimbetova, G. A. ., & Salem, S. . (2025). How is The Impact of Applying Contextual Approach in Mathematics Learning?. Attadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 8(1), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.54069/attadrib.v8i1.888