AI-Mediated Critical Thinking: A Double-Edged Sword in Indonesian Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54069/attaqwa.v22i2.1155Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Critical thinking, Digital literacy, Cognitive offloading, Online learningAbstract
The proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education presents a paradoxical challenge: while offering unprecedented access to information, it may simultaneously erode the very cognitive skills it aims to enhance. This study investigates the moderating role of digital literacy on the relationship between AI usage patterns and critical thinking skills among 245 Indonesian university students engaged in online learning. Employing a cross-sectional survey design, data were collected using the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) and the European Commission's Digital Competence Framework (DigComp 2.2). Multiple regression and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) analyses revealed that AI usage intensity negatively predicted critical thinking (β = -0.24, p < 0.01). However, this relationship was moderated by digital literacy (β = 0.22, p < 0.01), with high digital literacy students demonstrating positive associations between AI use and critical thinking (β = 0.15, p < 0.05). In contrast, low digital literacy students showed stronger negative effects (β = -0.38, p < 0.001). Cluster analysis identified three distinct user profiles: selective users (35.1%) with the highest critical thinking scores (M = 35.8), instrumental users (41.6%, M = 32.1), and dependent users (23.3%, M = 27.4). These findings suggest that AI's impact on critical thinking depends on users' digital competencies, underscoring the need for integrated digital literacy curricula to harness AI's potential while mitigating cognitive offloading risks.
Downloads
References
Beck, E. L., Roger PielkeJr,Silke. (2010). A Democracy Paradox in Studies of Science and Technology—Eva Lövbrand, Roger Pielke, Silke Beck, 2011. Science, Technology, & Human Values. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0162243910366154
Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
den Hollander, N., Struyf, A., Georgiou, D., & Wong, J. (2025). From perception to policy: Course coordinators’ views on generative artificial intelligence in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2024-0842
Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Grillo, F., & Nanetti, R. (2020). Innovation and democracy: The twin paradoxes. Area Development and Policy, 5(3), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2020.1777880
Jogezai, N. A., Koroleva, D., & Ivanov, I. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Challenges, opportunities and future course of actions to achieve sustainable development goals. International Journal of Educational Management, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2024-0786
Jose, B., Cherian, J., Verghis, A. M., Varghise, S. M., S, M., & Joseph, S. (2025). The cognitive paradox of AI in education: Between enhancement and erosion. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1550621
Kasworm, C. E., Rose, A. D., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2010). Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education. SAGE.
Larson, B. Z., Moser, C., Caza, A., Muehlfeld, K., & Colombo, L. A. (2024). Critical Thinking in the Age of Generative AI. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 23(3), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2024.0338
Lodge, J. M., Ellerton, P., Zaphir, L., & Brown, D. (2024). Assessing in the Age of AI: Is Critical Thinking the Answer? In Artificial Intelligence Applications in K-12. Routledge.
Loginov, A. (2025). Digital metacognition: Awareness, regulation, and analysis of thinking in digital environments. Next Research, 2(4), 100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2025.100770
Miola, L., Muffato, V., Sella, E., Meneghetti, C., & Pazzaglia, F. (2024). GPS use and navigation ability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 99, 102417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102417
Muñoz Martínez, C., Roger-Monzo, V., & Castelló Sirvent, F. (2025). IA generativa y pensamiento crítico en la educación universitaria a distancia: Desafíos y oportunidades. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.28.2.43556
Muthmainnah, Ibna Seraj, P. M., & Oteir, I. (2022). Playing with AI to Investigate Human-Computer Interaction Technology and Improving Critical Thinking Skills to Pursue 21st Century Age. Education Research International, 2022(1), 6468995. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6468995
Ninghardjanti, P., Umam, M. C., Subarno, A., Winarno, W., Langgi, N. R., & Widodo, J. (2025a). Evaluating the impact of AI on the critical thinking skills among the higher education students by combining the TAM model and critical thinking theory. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1719625. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1719625
Ninghardjanti, P., Umam, M. C., Subarno, A., Winarno, W., Langgi, N. R., & Widodo, J. (2025b). Evaluating the impact of AI on the critical thinking skills among the higher education students by combining the TAM model and critical thinking theory. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1719625
Parker, L., Loper, A. J., Carter, C. W., Hayes, J., & Karakas, A. (2026). Longitudinal insights into AI in education: Usage, ethics, and policy development in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 10, 100329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100329
Rafida, T., Suwandi, S., & Ananda, R. (2024). EFL Students’ Perception in Indonesia and Taiwan on Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Writing Skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(3), 987–1016. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i3.1520
Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive Offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
Sample Size Determination Table, 30 Educational and psychological Measurement 607 (1970).
Shah, P. (2023). AI and the Future of Education: Teaching in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. John Wiley & Sons.
Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.T2025102700000291759377835
Sutrisno, S., Azis, A., Setyawan, M. B., Dewi, D. A., Hidayah, Y., Hakiki, M., Hamid, M. A., & Fadli, R. (2025). Assessing students’ readiness for artificial intelligence-based project learning to strengthen local wisdom values in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2582948
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory and E-Learning. In G. Biswas, S. Bull, J. Kay, & A. Mitrovic (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 5–6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_3
Syukur, F., Maghfurin, A., Marhamah, U., & Jehwae, P. (2024). Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Islamic Higher Education: Comparative Responses between Indonesia and Thailand. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(3), 531–553. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v7i3.13
Szmyd, K., & Mitera, E. (2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Development of Critical Thinking Skills in Students. EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL, XXVII(Issue 2), 1022–1039. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/3876
Tang, K.-S., Cooper, G., Rappa, N., & Edwards, J. (2026). Critical questioning with generative AI: Developing AI literacy in secondary education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102043
Teng, Y., Li, H.-X., Chen, S. X., Castellanos, F. X., Yan, C.-G., & Hu, X. (2024). Mapping the neural mechanism that distinguishes between holistic thinking and analytic thinking. NeuroImage, 294, 120627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120627
Tezer, M. (2025). Metacognitive Engagement in AI-Supported Learning: Frameworks, Challenges, and Transformations. In Metacognition in Action—Insights into Learning, AI, and Self-Regulation. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1012658
Uzun, A., Sevi̇M, O., & Sevi̇M, S. (2026). ChatGPT-supported interactive learning activities: A mixed-methods study of writing performance and motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2026.2625390
Wale, B. D. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Effects of using integrative automated writing evaluation programs on honing academic writing instruction. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 43(1), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i1.67715
Yang, Y. (2026). Knowledge culture in the postdigital era: Reclaiming knowledge as a public good. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 58(3), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2025.2584739
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rizal Shohibur Ridlo, Femi Samuel ILIASU, Siti Ma`rufah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
