Personalization of Academic Interests: The Impact of Differentiated Smart Flipbook on Motivation and Concept Mastery in Reproductive System Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54069/attadrib.v9i1.1130Keywords:
Differentiated Smart Flipbook, Differentiated Learning, Reproductive System, AI Chatbot, Learning OutcomesAbstract
Learning the human reproductive system in secondary schools is often hampered by the abstraction of complex biological concepts and by psychological barriers that conventional methods do not accommodate. This study aims to test the effectiveness of Differentiated Smart Flipbook media integrated with an AI Chatbot in improving concept mastery and motivation, and to investigate its inclusiveness for students with different academic interest profiles, namely Science and Sports. Using a Quasi-Experiment design with a Nonequivalent Control Group Design pattern, the study involved 113 ninth-grade students of MTs Negeri 3 Grobogan. The results of statistical tests showed that the experimental class achieved an N-Gain increase of 0.70 (high category), significantly higher than the control class, which achieved only 0.21. The most crucial finding was that this media successfully minimized the achievement gap; students interested in Sports accelerated their learning with an N-Gain of 0.67, closely following Science students (0.72). In-depth analysis reveals the operation of the Dual Coding mechanism: the AI Chatbot feature effectively facilitates Science students’ analytical skills (C4) through in-depth inquiry. At the same time, 3D visualization strengthens Sports students’ application skills (C3) through physical contextualization. It is concluded that AI-based content personalization effectively reduces cognitive load and significantly increases motivation, especially in the Relevance and Confidence aspects, making this medium an adaptive solution for realizing inclusive and equitable biology learning.
Downloads
References
Abaniel, A. (2020). Enhanced conceptual understanding, 21st century skills and learning attitudes through an open inquiry learning model in physics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 5(3), 184–193.
Arsyad, M. (2024). The efficiency of using visual learning media in improving the understanding of science concepts in elementary school students. Indonesian Journal of Education, 4(3), 775–787. https://www.injoe.org/index.php/INJOE/article/view/57
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach (1st ed.). Springer New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Chen, C. C., & Tsai, Y. H. (2025). Effect of interactive e-book use on learning engagement, satisfaction and perceived learning. Education and Information Technologies, 30(11), 15757–15789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13415-w
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. AREA-D American Education Research Association’s Devision.D, 2(7), 449–455.http://www.physics.indiana.edu/sdi.AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf
Johansen, M. O., Eliassen, S., & Jeno, L. M. (2023). Increasing content relevance enhances student motivation and vitality. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(9), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1184804
Keller, J. M. (2009). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach. Springer.
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia Learning (3rd ed). Cambridge University Press.
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual (7th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.
Rahmayanti, H. D. (2024). A study of optical properties of edible film based coconut water for sustainable and environmentally friendly materials packaging. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1359, Number 1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1359/1/012109
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian). Parama Publishing.
Rukman, R. (2024). The surprise box learning media on human reproductive system material. Side: Scientific Development Journal, 1(1), 17–23.
Sitorus, A. S. (2025). Pembelajaran berdiferensiasi pada kurikulum merdeka: tinjauan teoretis tentang implementasi, tantangan dan peluang. Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI), 7(2). https://doi.org/10.61227/arji.v7i2.446
Sugianto, S., Liunokas, A. B., Listari, N., Dewi, N. P. Y. A., Rasyid, A., & Chaidir, D. M. (2023). Development of human reproductive system e-module teaching materials using the flip pdf corporate application. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 10965–10972. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4573
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suparno, P. (2021). Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan Sains. Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Wahyuni, N., Suwono, H., & Lestari, U. (2019). Learning difficulties of high school students in understanding the material of human reproductive systems triggering misconceptions. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 7(4), 116–121. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jps/
Widiyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2018). An overview of conceptual understanding in science education curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012044
Widodo, J. P., Subandowo, M., Musyarofah, L., & Slamet, J. (2023). Interactive gamification-flip-book for developing students’ outcomes. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 754–762. https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2023.02.002
Zamzam, F., & Marsinah, L. (2021). Model Penulisan Tesis Manajemen Kuantitatif Berbasis Analisis dan Implikasi Manajerial (1st ed.). Deepublish.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rini Prihestiyani, Ellianawati Ellianawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
